Living on a dime

Sometimes ‘living on a dime’ is just an expression we use. For some it refers to cutting back on expenses or maybe even dipping into a savings or credit account to make ends meet. But for some people, in some places, this expression literally is a style of living.

The world is divided into three parts: First World countries, Second World countries and Third World countries. Poverty rates differ drastically between each division due to many, often overlapping, political, social, strategic, cultural and economic situations. Many in the Third World deal with very high poverty rates, where people have to scratch through their daily lives and find ways to feed and bathe their children, to put them to sleep in a safe place and find clothes for them to wear. But “need is the mother of all inventions”, and many people use their ingenuity to do some or all of that daily.

Palestine is not much different from any other Third World country. It also suffers from poverty, and has witnessed a huge increase in poverty rates over the last eight years. The Gaza Strip is a small part of Palestine that extends along the coast of the Mediterranean Sea. It is densely populated and suffers from very high rates of poverty and unemployment.

The Gaza Strip has three main commercial ports that allow goods, materials, medical aid, building tools, food to enter. Unfortunately, they stay closed most of the time because of the political situation that we suffer from which leaves all Gazans living on a dime whether we chose it or not.

No electricity, no fuel, no food, no water, no medicine and no life is our daily life here in Gaza; but life cannot stop; it just has to go on and Gazans make sure that happens. Of course, these band-aids have their advantages and disadvantages. Take fuel for instance. Gazans came up with a fuel formula that the world was not aware of before by mixing cooking oil with gasoline. The fuel they came up with can make cars run perfectly.

Advantages: it is very cheap as people turn to falafel shops and restaurants to take huge tanks of used cooking oil for half a dollar each.

Disadvantages: it pollutes the air with huge amounts of smoke and damages the car’s engine if used over the long run.

The fuel formula has been used to develop other products too. Gazans invented cooking tools and ovens that work using the same formula.

Advantages: the oven is very powerful and takes no time to cook, plus the formula is very cheap.

Disadvantages: It produces very high heat and can be dangerous to start and operate.

Using the same formula you can also have a light bulb which is very useful due to the constant electricity outages and a heating system that comes handy in winter.

Advantages: cheap sources of light and heat.

Disadvantages: It produces polluted smoke and can be dangerous to operate and start.

Small (but effective) electric cooking tools:
Cooking tools that depend on electricity to produce a huge amount of heat in no time using iron as the main component in manufacturing them.

Advantages: cooks in no time, very small and doesn’t take any space and very cheap (very affordable).

Disadvantages: the electricity is out most of the time, which makes the electric tools useless, very dangerous and contains naked wires.

Living tents: it’s not an invention but they coped with living in tents like living in houses due to the demolish of their own homes.

Advantages: better than living in the street, a place to live and sleep in and without monthly rent payments.

Disadvantages: It doesn’t protect from the rain, can burn while cooking, very hot in the morning and cold in the night, strained dogs can bite through it and hurt the whole family, and doesn’t apply as a healthy living place.

Gazans live on scratch literally, they use wood and flammable materials to make fire, tents to live in, any edible things for food, public or nearby faucets for water or children’s bathing and dish washing, the beach to bathe their children and wash their clothes and dishes, sleep on the floor, and any kind of cloth to sew and stitch for their children to wear.

“Living on a dime” has a whole new sensation here in the Gaza strip that you have to come, see, feel and experience yourself.

–

About the writer: Omar is a 22-year-old journalist living in Gaza – Palestine.

Understanding the Palestinian-Israeli screenplay: How Bibi and Obama pose as actors, not directors

Behind every meeting, there are the untold stories. I like to think of these symbolic gestures as a theater setup to include actors. Sometimes, if you know enough about what’s happening, you can even figure out who the marionettes are. From this, it becomes evident that the key players are simply moving in accordance to pre-emptive deals made by these marionettes. The manipulators of these marionettes being the Israel lobby, the fundamentalist ideologies of both Zionist and Palestinian extremist groups, as well as the compromised foreign policy of the United States.  It is extremely important to understand first the behind-the-scenes developments of the conflict as well as the past of both Netanyahu and Obama before attempting to analyze the meeting itself.

Benjamin Netanyahu is a staunch military Zionist. What does this mean? To start, let’s define Zionism. It is a religious-nationalist movement aimed towards establishing and maintaining the religious homeland of the Jews. This religious homeland, defined in the Judeo-Christian faiths, has been established as the area formerly known as Palestine. The religious significance of this movement is extremely important, because it rules out the establishment of a Jewish homeland in any other region of the world.

For Netanyahu, this includes retaining rights to the Occupied Territories and all of Jerusalem. To do this, he continues to be an adamant supporter of illegal settlements in the Occupied Territories. During his previous term as prime minister, Netanyahu went so far as to issue an apology to illegal settlers in the Occupied Territories regarding cuts to their federal welfare checks while simultaneously celebrating the drop of Palestinian birth rates in these areas.

To make matters worse, Netanyahu believes that U.S.-backed peace talks are “a waste of time.” Combined with his previous statement on Palestinians, how can one trust that the future of Palestinian statehood and well being are even part of Bibi’s everyday conversation?

Obama enters the current conflict well-intentioned and diplomatically hopeful. But much like his predecessors, I believe that he will share the same political frustrations as Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, to name a few. For Truman, his anger at the persistence of the Zionist lobby during his time pushed him to allow his own ambassadors to ensure the implementation of UN Resolution 181 through whatever means it would take, including bribery of other member states and political manipulation of the rest. Kennedy was faced with lack of Israeli cooperation in his attempts to monitor their nuclear weapons programs. Not only did this lead to the development of Israel’s nuclear stockpile, but contributed to the much-feared proliferation of nuclear weapons throughout the Middle East. Jimmy Carter expressed much of his frustrations post-presidency, particularly evident in his book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid. And Bill Clinton was left with the wreckage of the Camp David talks, an event that top Israeli officials would later come to admit that they themselves would not have accepted had they been Palestinian.

Obama is facing the immense power of the Israel lobby (particularly AIPAC) domestically, and he is also confronting a man like Netanyahu abroad. Since his inauguration, AIPAC has successfully managed to campaign and release some of its top officials from criminal charges of treason - charges that arose from their decision to pass sensitive information regarding the US onto Israeli intelligence. And since his inauguration, Netanyahu has already come out and proclaimed US involvement in the conflict as a “waste of time”.

The recent meeting between Netanyahu and Obama, it seems, was nothing but a façade.

For peace negotiations to truly move forward, I believe a three-party system is inevitably doomed for failure. Just as Israel uses the United States as its personal proxy, I believe another power will need to become involved to promote the Palestinian interests in a non-violent and productive way. So far, it is evident that potential and legitimate candidates have failed to assume this role, notably the Arab League and the Arab-American communities within the United States. And as a result, we have militant and violent actors such as Hezbollah and Hamas that are attempting to assume the face of Palestine.

This new distribution of power could also very well include the European Union, who has had a history of sympathizing with the Palestinians. After all, Israel did just threaten the EU to “tone down its criticism” of her. But given the immense socio-economic leverage that the EU holds, it may just be enough to offset the Israeli-stronghold on the United States. Obama will not be able to turn his speeches into action alone. Netanyahu has made this clear with his statements and previous political behavior as prime minister of Israel.

And thus the cycle continues of glossed-over talks and political meetings that ultimately equate to no real progress.

But if the marionettes on both sides of the conflict (including the militant organizations among Palestinians as well as Zionists within the Israeli government) are faced with new, key players that will not participate in pre-emptive deals like the United States, we may be seeing the release of a newer, much more peaceful play set on the world stage.

Breaking Homes and Hearts in Jerusalem

If home is where the heart is, then the hearts of countless Palestinians are being shattered as Israel continues to demolish Palestinian homes in Jerusalem.

Last Friday, the United Nations released a report on Israel’s demolition plans for another 1,500 homes in East Jerusalem, based on Tel Aviv’s claim that the homes were built without permits from Israel’s Jerusalem municipality.

There are lots of issues with Israel’s claims about what it calls a “planning crisis” in East Jerusalem. First of all, Israel’s control of East Jerusalem itself is not recognized by the international community, as it illegally annexed the city after the 1967 war. But although Israel’s control of East Jerusalem is unlawful, Palestinians have to deal with the facts that it created on the ground, applying for permits to build their homes on land that has belonged to their families for generations.

This brings us to the second issue: the Israeli authorities have only set aside 13 percent of East Jerusalem for Palestinian residents. Much of that area is already crowded, and with the Palestinian population jumping from 66,000 in 1967 to 250,000 today, Palestinians have been forced to build their homes “illegally,” according to the Israeli government. And finally the third issue comes along, namely that few Palestinians who apply for permits within the designated Palestinian area of East Jerusalem are actually able to obtain them.

If the Israeli government goes ahead with its plans for solving its “planning crisis,” at least 28 percent of all Palestinian homes in East Jerusalem are at risk of demolition. That’s at least 60,000 Palestinians at risk of becoming homeless. Recognizing the situation that could arise from these plans, United Nations has called on Israel to immediately halt its demolitions, and provide real solutions for the housing crisis in the Holy City.

The international community must put pressure on Israel to end this inhumane eviction of Palestinians from their traditional home. It is both illegal and a serious obstacle to any progress on the peace process. Arab newspapers like the secular, pan-Arab al-Quds al-Arabi are calling Israel’s actions in East Jerusalem “ethnic cleansing,” indicating the level of anger felt on the Arab street. Similarly, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has called the demolitions “unhelpful,” and EU diplomats have described them as illegal and said they “fuel bitterness and extremism.”

The Palestinians have fought, and continue to fight, for their rights under the state apparatus of Israel. But this is one fight that they cannot win on their own. All those who claim to support human rights and international law must rally together to bring an end to Israel’s unlawful demolition of Palestinian homes. That way, the Palestinian people can focus their energies not on picking up the pieces of their shattered hearts, but on working towards the peace that both they and their counterparts in Israel so desperately need.

Read more on this issue:

• End Palestinian demolitions in Jerusalem, UN tells Israel (The Guardian)
• U.N. Seeks End to Razing of Homes in East Jerusalem (The New York Times)
• UN calls on Israel to end evictions (Al Jazeera English)

–

Credit: Nour Merza, a 21-year-old freelance writer whose family’s globe-trotting tendencies have allowed her writing to be influenced by places as varied as Saudi Arabia, Chicago, Los Angeles and the United Arab Emirates. She also enjoys singing and improving her Arabic. Currently, she’s studying International Relations at the American University of Sharjah. Find more of her work on her blog, Crisscrossing Borders.